10.4 Summary
Chapter 10 in review
Chapter 10 applied GLMs to count data — binary outcomes, count outcomes, and the extensions needed when real data violate the standard assumptions.
We covered:
-
Binomial regression (Section 10.1): Logit link for binary and aggregated binomial outcomes. Coefficients are log-odds; interpret on the probability scale.
-
Poisson regression (Section 10.2): Log link for count outcomes. Use offsets for varying exposure. Always check for overdispersion (variance > mean).
-
Other count regressions (Section 10.3): Negative binomial for overdispersion, zero-inflated Poisson for excess zeros, hurdle models for two-stage processes. Choose based on the data-generating process.
Key formulas
- Logit link:
- Log link:
- Offset:
- Negative binomial variance:
- ZIP:
Key lessons
- The likelihood must match the data-generating process, or the model will mislead.
- Overdispersion is the rule, not the exception — always check.
- Interpret coefficients on the natural scale (probabilities, counts), not the link scale.
- Use posterior predictive checks to verify the model reproduces key features.
- Choose among Poisson, NB, ZIP, and hurdle based on theory, not just fit.
The likelihood is the model. In Chapter 10, the choice of likelihood — binomial, Poisson, negative binomial, ZIP, hurdle — is the choice of model. Each likelihood encodes different assumptions about the data-generating process. The linear predictor and link function are the same; the likelihood is what changes. This is the power of the GLM framework: it separates the structural model (linear predictor + link) from the stochastic model (likelihood), allowing us to choose each independently. But this power comes with responsibility: the likelihood must match the data. If it does not, no amount of clever coding will save the model.